Measured, not guessed
Every scalp scan records density, terminal-to-vellus ratio and miniaturisation with the same six-zone protocol, so one patient's month-6 can be compared with their own month-0 — not with a marketing photo.
Open by design
Not a portal that asks you to donate data. A window into how Goglo clinicians work, what we measure, and what we are willing to publish.
Goglo is building a structured hair-loss registry inside everyday clinical care. We have not yet published peer-reviewed papers from it, and we will not claim outcomes we cannot show. This page exists so you can watch that work take shape rather than take our word for it.
Method
Every scalp scan records density, terminal-to-vellus ratio and miniaturisation with the same six-zone protocol, so one patient's month-6 can be compared with their own month-0 — not with a marketing photo.
AI output is always labelled an estimate until a clinician reviews it. Nothing reaches a patient chart as fact without a named doctor's confirmation.
When a medicine is prescribed, the reasoning card records why it was chosen for this phenotype, what is expected by when, and what would make us change course.
Monthly check-ins capture shedding, adherence and side effects. Care that is not followed up cannot be studied — and cannot be improved.
Collaboration
Cohort clubs group patients whose hair loss shares a driver. Each club has more than one specialty reviewing it, so the plan is built by the doctors who actually own that cause.
Dermatology + Endocrinology
Thyroid panels reviewed alongside scalp findings before any regrowth plan is finalised.
Dermatology + Gynaecology
Hormonal timelines, pregnancy and lactation safety checks built into the prescribing flow.
Dermatology + Oncology follow-up
Regrowth expectations set against treatment history rather than generic timelines.
Trichology + Dermatopathology
Seborrhoeic, lichen planopilaris and scarring patterns separated early, before graft planning.
Difficult cases are presented to clinicians in more than one country before a surgical plan is signed. The intent is simple: a second and third opinion should be routine, not something a patient has to chase.
Ethics
Using Goglo for treatment never enrols you in research. Research consent is a distinct, revocable opt-in, and withdrawing it changes nothing about your care.
Anything we call a study goes through an institutional ethics committee first. Until that approval exists, we describe our work as internal quality tracking — not research.
Cohort views are built on de-identified records. Photographs never leave the clinical chart for research use without an explicit, separate permission.
Check-ins and consent text are being translated so patients answer in the language they think in. A questionnaire nobody understands produces data nobody should trust.
Roadmap
Now
Standardised scans, histories and monthly reviews collected inside routine care across partner centres.
Next
Protocol and consent documents prepared for institutional ethics committee review before any analysis is published.
Then
Club-level outcome summaries shared publicly on this page — including the results that did not work.
Ongoing
Quarterly multi-country case panels where surgeons and physicians review difficult cases together.
Nothing published yet. When a manuscript is submitted, accepted or rejected, it will be listed here with its status — including studies whose findings were negative.
We welcome collaborators who want to review protocols, join case panels or help translate patient materials into more Indian and regional languages.
Find a partner centre